EU watchdog to clarify ESG fund naming rules after backlash
New ESMA sustainable fund naming rules to apply Nov. 21
Investors say exclusions will limit energy transition finance
Regulator says it is considering further guidance
Unclear if exclusions will be reversed
By Virginia Furness
LONDON, Oct 11 (Reuters) -The European Union's securities watchdog is considering changes or clarification to incoming rules on the naming of sustainable investment funds, after investors warned they could make it harder for polluters to access cash they want to decarbonise.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)'s new rules, which will apply from Nov. 21, set out how funds can label themselves as 'sustainable' or 'green', the latest regulatory effort to root out greenwashing - exaggerated claims about environmental credentials.
Under the rules, funds using words including 'green', 'environmental' or 'impact' in their names will be barred from investing in oil and gas, coal and the most polluting electricity companies.
Fund managers must change their fund names or sell assets that breach the criteria. Research firm Clarity AI's analysis shows that around 55% of in-scope funds have at least one investment in breach.
Some industry trade bodies and fund managers say the new rules could restrict sustainable investment by preventing companies in high-emitting sectors from financing ringfenced projects like renewable energy. Others argue that changes could undermine confidence among issuers and investors more broadly.
"Our main concern is not so much the impact on a given company or fund, it is the signalling to green bond issuers and investors that regulators could disrupt the market with new rules," said Agnes Gourc, BNP Paribas' head of sustainable capital markets.
She also said the ESMA's guidelines' focus on companies contradicts other EU rules like the EU Green Bond Standard or the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), which allow investors to assess the sustainability credentials of a bond on a purely project basis.
An ESMA spokesperson declined to comment directly on criticism the rules could disrupt the green bond market but said: "ESMA is considering certain specific issues related to the practical application of the guidelines on funds' names using ESG (environmental, social and governance)- or sustainability-related terms, including whether there is a need to provide further guidance."
An ESMA official told trade publication Responsible Investor this week it was looking at how the rules applied to green bonds specifically. It was unclear whether ESMA was considering dropping the exclusions and the spokesperson declined further comment.
While supporters of green bonds say they incentivise businesses and governments to invest in greener schemes, critics say they do little to encourage fundamental change to polluting business models.
Energy and power companies represent a fifth of the global green bond market and have issued more than $70 billion-worth this year, according to LSEG data.
Excluding them from funds calling themselves sustainable could raise their cost of capital, hinder key projects and slow the energy transition, the European Fund and Asset Management Association warned this week.
Reporting by Virginia Furness
Editing by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes and Philippa Fletcher
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
